Legal Opinion

Esposito v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 4, 1924No. 2400PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Alum-tanned lambskins imported at the port of New York and classified by the collector of customs as glove leather, were assessed for duty at 20 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1431 of the tariff act of 1922, which paragraph reads as follows:

Par. 1431. Chamois skins, pianoforte, pianoforte-action, player-piano-action leather, enameled upholstery leather, bag, strap, case, football, and glove leather finished, in the white or in the crust, and seal, sheep, goat, and calf leather dressed and finished, other than shoe leather, 20 per centum ad valorem.

The importers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. RiebeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Keshishian & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Kaufman & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. United States v. GreshamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  5. United States v. TausigCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API