United States v. Kaufman & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Seal leather in the crust, imported at the port of New York, was classified by the collector of customs as bag leather and assessed for duty at 20 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1431 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:
1431. Chamois skins, pianoforte, pianoforte-action, playerpiano-action leather, enameled upholstery leather, bag, strap, case, football, and glove leather, finished, in the white or in the crust, and seal, sheep, goat, and calf leather, dressed and finished, other than shoe leather, 20 per centum ad valorem.
The importer protested that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. ReddenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Esposito v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Keshishian & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. R. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. AndrewsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Francesco Parisi Fwdg. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Marmax Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Nelbach v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.