Legal Opinion

United States v. Gresham

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 2, 1932No. 3508Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hatfield, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court.

Merchandise, consisting of rough tanned leather, was assessed for duty by the collector 'at the port of Cleveland, Ohio, as “bag and strap leather” at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1431 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Par. 1431. Chamois skins, pianoforte, pianoforte-action, playerpiano-action leather, enameled upholstery leather, bag, strap, case, football, and glove leather, finished, in the white or in the crust, and seal, sheep, goat, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldsmith's Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. ReddenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Esposito v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API