City of Albemarle v. Security Bank & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Judge.
Defendant first asserts the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to join DOT as a necessary party pursuant to G.S. 136-66.3. In this case plaintiff and DOT entered into an agreement whereby this project would be undertaken through the Department’s Small Urban Improvements Program to assist municipalities with traffic problems. Under this agreement the parties agreed to share in the cost of the acquisition of the necessary right-of-way for this project. Pursuant to G.S. 136-66.3(g) a municipality is vested with the same authority to acquire…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Curl by and Through Curl v. KeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Waldrop v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Rice v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Venable v. School Committee of Pilot MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hope—A Women's Cancer Center, P.A. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Dempsey v. Transouth Mortgage Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1999
- City of Wilson v. Batten Family, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Turnamics, Inc. v. Advanced Envirotech Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1999
- City of Albemarle v. Security Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992