Legal Opinion
Brown v. Durham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 14, 1936No. 23247PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
In November of 1923, M. E. Durham, acting in a lay capacity, entered into a contract with Adelbert Brown, an attorney, to conduct a business under the name of Oklahoma Taxpayers Association The business consisted of protesting and filing suits to recover alleged illegal taxes in behalf of taxpayers. The nature of the enterprise was such that it could not be carried on without the filing and prosecution of actions jn courts of law. Crawford, Co. Treas., v. McConnell, 173 Okla. 520, 49 P. (2d) 551.
Under the contract Durham agreed, among other things, to solicit the business for the association.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Huber v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Crawford v. McConnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Hunt v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Beams v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Missouri Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Scott & ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Merrell v. . StuartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Merrell v. StuartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Rogers v. Lassiter, Adm'r.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- In Re DurhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Porter v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949