Hunt v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Okmulgee County; Mark L. Bozarth, Judge. Action by tbe W. T. Bawleigh Medical Company against Clarence W. Hunt and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, C. J.
Plaintiff’s action was to recover of Clarence W. Hunt, as principal, and W. R. Dawson and I. H. Mayfield, as guarantors, a .balance of $826.81 on account of certain bills of merchandise sold Hunt, pursuant to a written contract between him and tbe plaintiff, the] performance of which, it was charged, was guaranteed by the ¡defendants' Dawson and Mayfield. The contract in all material respects is identical with th^ one before us in Stewart et al. v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co., 58 Okla. 344, 159 Pac. 1187, L. R. A. 1917A, 1276, and which was held to be a contract in restraint of trade, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Coppell v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- First State Bank of Keota v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- McGuffin v. Coyle and GussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Sellers v. CrossanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tidal Oil Company v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Brooks v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Crawford v. McConnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Arman v. Structiform Engineering Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.