Legal Opinion

Porter v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1949No. 3854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Jackson Barnett, a restricted Creek Indian, died leaving a large estate. Conflicting claims to the estate were asserted under the law of descent and distribution. The claims were adjudicated in a judgment entered in a proceeding in the United States Court for Eastern Oklahoma, and the judgment was affirmed. Scott v. Beams, 10 Cir., 122 F.2d 777, certiorari denied, Brady v. Beams, 315 U.S. 809, 62 S.Ct. 794, 86 L.Ed. 1208. A proceeding in the nature of a bill of review was subsequently instituted to vacate the judgment adjudicating the claims. Judgment was *88entered…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Scott v. BeamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. United States v. Anglin & StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. Crites, Inc. v. Prudential Ins. Co. Of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Cobb v. CowderySupreme Court of Vermont · 1867
  5. Reilly v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co. v. Consumers Cooperative Association. Consumers Cooperative Association v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co. v. Consumers Cooperative Association. Consumers Cooperative Association v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Meyer Lumber & Hardware Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API