Legal Opinion

Busher, Clerk v. Fulton, Supt.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1934No. 24708PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Plaintiff in error rests his case upon two principal grounds. First, that since the Trust Company accepted the funds for deposit with express knowledge of their source and with knowledge of the purpose for which they were to be used, a special deposit, constituting a trust, was created, which is entitled to preferential payment. Second, that the deposit of the funds was unauthorized, and consequently the well recognized principle applies that where a custodian of public or other trust funds deposits the same wrongfully or unlawfully in a. financial institution which knows the nature thereof,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. StrawnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  2. Paul v. DraperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. People Ex Rel. Russell v. Farmers State & Savings Bank of Grant ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Corp. Commission v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Fogg v. TylerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Umbaugh Pole Building Co. v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Citizens Bank & Trust Company of Park Ridge, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. Squire, Supt. v. OxenreiterOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Union Properties, Inc. v. Baldwin Bros.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Guardian Trust Co. v. KirbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API