Legal Opinion
Flack v. . Hood, Comr.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 15, 1933PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The case is controlled by the decision in Parker v. Trust Co., 202 N. C., 230, 162 S. E., 564 (Newsom v. Mut. Life Asso., 136 So. (Fla.), 389, likewise practically on all-fours), unless the circumstance, appearing here, but which did not appear there, that the account of the trust department with the commercial department was overdrawn at the time of the closing of the Central Bank and Trust Company, differentiates the two cases and reduces plaintiff’s claim from one of preference to one of commonalty.
It is the position of the plaintiff that the method of handling the account in question was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Brennan v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Corp. Commission v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Andrews v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Cocke v. Hood Ex Rel. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- In Re Champion Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Zachery v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.