Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Cone Mills Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1985No. 8410IC1051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiff argues on appeal that the Industrial Commission erred in finding that Brown Goodman’s disability and death were not caused, or contributed to, by his exposure to cotton dust in his employment with Cone Mills. We conclude that the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to support the Commission’s findings and its denial of plaintiffs claim. Accordingly, we must affirm its decision.

The evidence before the Commission tended to show that Brown Goodman was employed by Cone Mills for 47 years and that he retired on 31 March 1971 at the age of 66. During the entire…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Davis v. Raleigh Rental CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. McLean v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gosney v. Golden Belt ManufacturingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Chambers v. Transit Mgmt.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2004
  3. Futrell v. Resinall Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Futrell v. Resinall Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Morris v. Kelly Springfield Tire Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API