Futrell v. Resinall Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentGreene, Judge
I disagree with the majority that our case law requires a plaintiff who is attempting to prove an aggravation of his disease due to his employment to show he was also at a greater risk of contracting the disease than the general population, I therefore dissent in part I of the majority opinion.
For diseases not specifically listed in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-53, such as carpal tunnel syndrome, the claimant must show that his disease is considered occupational under section 97-53(13). N.C.G.S. § 97-53(13) (2001). The burden rests on the claimant to show that: (1) “ ‘a causal connection between the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Norris v. Drexel Heritage Furnishings, Inc./MascoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Goodman v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985