Legal Opinion
In Re Securities and Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 24, 1944No. 8463PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The appeal at bar presents for our determination the question of the meaning of the phrase “fair and equitable” contained in Section 11(e) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79k (e). In view of the exhaustive opinion of the Commission, 1 those of its concurring and dissenting members and that of the District Court 2 it is unnecessary to include here an extended statement of facts for the questions before us are primarily those of law.
The United Light & Power Company, a solvent registered holding company, a Maryland corporation, is at the top…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Foster v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Midland United Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- In Re United Gas CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- In re Engineers Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Okin v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.