Legal Opinion
In Re Midland United Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 11, 1944No. 1073PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
It is my duty to determine whether a plan of reorganization 1 for Midland United Company (United) and Midland Utilities Company (Utilities), two Delaware corporations and registered holding companies, jointly proposed by their trustees, meets the requirements of Section 174 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 574. This court obtained jurisdiction of both corporations pursuant to the provisions of Section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207. The plan of reorganization was submitted on November 9, 1943 by the trustees to the Securities and Exchange Commission as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Drivers, Salesmen, Warehousemen, Milk Processors, Cannery, Dairy Employees & Helpers Local No. 695 v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of Equity Funding Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1975
- In Re Midland United Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Central States Electric Corporation v. AustrianCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- In re Engineers Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.