Legal Opinion

Haldeman v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1876No. 157PublishedCited by 68 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kentucky.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

This is an action of debt against the plaintiffs in error on a bond conditioned for the performance of official duty by Haldeman, as surveyor of the customs, and depositary of the public moneys, at Louisville, Ky. They pleaded four pleas of judgment recovered for the same cause .of- action, to each of which the court below sustained a demurrer. The correctness of these rulings presents the only point in the case.

It is a general rule, that a plea of former recovery,- whether it be by confession, verdict, or demurrer, is. a bar to any new action of the same or the- like nature for the same…

2Cited by68 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Richard Chira v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Saylor v. LindsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. Baer Bros. Mercantile Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. United States v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API