Legal Opinion
Wiggins v. Hain Pure Protein Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 9, 2011No. 10 Civ. 4098 (DLC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DENISE COTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff David Wiggins (“Wiggins”) brings this action against his former employer, Hain Pure Protein Corporation (“HPPC”), for breach of contract and violation of the New York Labor Law. Wiggins was fired in April of 2009 and seeks payment of a 2008 bonus, severance pay, rights in an equity plan, and payment for unused vacation. Following the close of discovery, HPPC filed a motion for summary judgment on May 27, 2011. For the following reasons, HPPC’s motion for summary judgment is granted.1
BACKGROUND
I. The Formation of HPPC and Hiring of Wiggins…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wright v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- SCR Joint Venture L.P. v. WarshawskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Marshall Granger & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025