Legal Opinion

United States v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 16, 2025No. 1:24-cv-03108Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ─────────────────────────────────── UNITED STATES OF AMERICA F/U/B/O SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION AND SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, 24-cv-3108 (JGK) Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION - against - AND ORDER PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ─────────────────────────────────── JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiff, Schindler Elevator Corporation (“Schindler”), brought this action in the name of the United States and for its use and benefit pursuant to the Miller Act,

40 U.S.C. § 3131

et seq. Schindler claims that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Nakahata v. New York-Presbyterian Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API