Smith Ex Rel. McDonnell v. Yellow Cab Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
Appellant (1) denies the constitutionality of section 319 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, 749, and (2) questions the interpre tation of that section by the court below. The legal plaintiff Smith was employed by the use-plaintiff McDonnell and in the course of his employment was injured by the negligence of appellant, the Yellow Cab Company. The employment was subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Law and Smith received compensation in the sum of $107.60, from his employer’s insurance carrier, also a use-plaintiff. In February, a few weeks after…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois Automobile Insurance Exchange v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Gentile v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Mesta Machine Co. v. Dunbar Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Mayhugh v. Somerset Telephone CoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zimmer v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Saber v. Supplee-Wills-Jones Milk Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth v. DodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. HaldemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Neal to Use v. B.R. P. Rwy. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.