Mayhugh v. Somerset Telephone Co
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 22, Oct. T., 1919, by defendant, from order of C. P. Somerset Co., Dec. T., 1917, No. 111, making absolute rule for subrogation in case of Benjamin H. Mayhugh to use of State Workmen’s Insurance Fund v. Somerset Telephone Company. Rule for subrogation. Before Baldwin, P. J., specially presiding. The court made the rule absolute. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Benjamin H. Mayhugh, an employee of the Bockwood Electric Light Company, was injured while in its employ, through the negligence of the Somerset Telephone Company, and recovered a judgment against it for $4,812, which we have this day affirmed in appeal No. 85, October Term, 1919. (See next case.) The State Workmen’s Insurance Fund paid the injured employee $1,-735.17 and the court below, on its petition, ordered that this amount of the judgment be marked to its use. From this order the Somerset Telephone Company has appealed. As we have affirmed the judgment against it, it cannot…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Wintersteen v. National Cooperage & Woodenware Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
- Scalise v. F. M. Venzie Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Zimmer v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Domtar Paper Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.