Legal Opinion

Copeland & Thompson, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 1, 1944No. C. D. 833PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

The merchandise at issue in this case consists of earthen tableware assessed for duty at 50 per centum ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces under paragraph 211 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that the articles are properly dutiable at 30 per centum ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces under paragraph 211 as amended by the trade agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom, T. D. 49753. At the trial counsel for the plaintiff limited the claim to “the items described on the invoice as oatmeals or oatmeal saucers wherever those items or that…

2Cited by44 opinions

  1. Johnson Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  2. Thorens, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  3. Davar Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Crosse & Blacewell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  5. Protests 117455-K of Johnson Bros.United States Customs Court · 1946

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API