Legal Opinion

Johnson Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 11, 1945No. C. D. 955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

The merchandise in question consists of earthen tableware assessed for duty at 50 per centum ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces under paragraph 211 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is dutiable at 30 per centum ad valorem plus 10 cents per dozen pieces under said paragraph as modified by the trade agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom, T. D. 49753". At the trial counsel for the plaintiff limited the claim to “the items described on the invoice as puree *114cups and chowder cups” and to such items described “as oatmeal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Copeland & Thompson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ross Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Thorens, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  3. Davar Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Protest 86730-K of L. Batlin & Son, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API