Legal Opinion

Davar Products, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 8, 1969No. C.D. 3880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

He, Judge:

The merchandise in these four protests, consolidated for trial, consists of lacquered plastic articles described as a snack bowl, a snack set, and a two-tiered tidbit tray. The snack bowl (plaintiff’s exhibit 1) is an eight-inch lacquered utility bowl imported in four different shapes. The snack set (plaintiff’s exhibit 2) consists of three flat-bottomed bowls in different sizes and one cover for the largest bowl, so designed that when not in use, they either can be stacked one upon the other or placed one inside the other. The largest of the snack set bowls contains the legend…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Copeland & Thompson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  2. Nomura (America) Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Laurence Myers Scaffolding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Johnson Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  5. M. & D. Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The United States v. Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API