Thorens, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cline, Judge:
This is a suit against the United States protesting the collector’s assessment of duty on merchandise, invoiced as “baby plates,” under paragraph 211 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at the rate of 10 cents per dozen pieces and 50 per centum ad valorem, as decorated earthenware. It is claimed that the merchandise' is properly dutiable at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 30 per centum ad valorem *68under paragraph 211, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom, T. D. 49753.
The pertinent provisions of the tariff act and the trade agreement are as follows:
Par. 211. Earthenware…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Copeland & Thompson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
- Johnson Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Silverite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- Silverite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- Silverite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- Thorens Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948