State v. Purser
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Frank D. Celebrezze Jr., Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Otis Purser Jr., appeals the determination of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Criminal Division, which classified him as a “sexual predator” pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(B)(1). For the following reasons, we find appellant’s appeal to be without merit.
{¶ 2} On March 9, 1999, Purser entered into a plea agreement with the state, wherein he agreed to plead guilty to six counts of rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02, which were amended to delete the language “under the age of thirteen years.” 1 The charges stemmed from a pattern of sexual abuse…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Commitment of SimonsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Pierce, 88470 (7-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Garner, 89840 (4-24-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Longnecker, Unpublished Decision (11-14-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. Reeves, 2006-T-0099 (9-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.