Legal Opinion
Claim for Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law of Priestley v. H. Hentz & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the State Industrial Board noticed on November 15, 1930.
Decision affirmed, on the authority of Harby v. Marwell Bros., Inc. (203 App. Div. 525; affd., 235 N. Y. 504); Matter of Jakeway v. Bauer Co. (218 App. Div. 302); Davidson v. Pansy Waist Co. (240 N. Y. 584). All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents, with an opinion.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Davidson v. Pansy Waist CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Claim of Harby v. Marwell Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Claim of Jakeway v. John F. Bauer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Matter of Harby v. . Marwell Brothers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Turner v. Cathedral Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- In re the Claim of CowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938