Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1933No. Docket No. 1742PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner is imprisoned in the state prison at San Quentin under a judgment of sentence imposed by the Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County for the crimes of bribing a witness and conspiracy to bribe a witness. The judgment of conviction was affirmed on appeal (People v. Martin, 114 Cal. App. 392 [300 Pac. 130]), and petitioner now seeks to be discharged on habeas corpus.

The application for the writ is filed by petitioner in propria persona. It contains some 560 closely typed and printed pages and is devoted chiefly to torrents of vituperation directed against those who…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. France v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. In Re KasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. In Re Application of GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re MoffettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. In Re CoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. In Re CutlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Chapman v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. People v. PICKLESIMERCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API