Legal Opinion

In Re Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1920No. Crim. No. 2290PublishedCited by 41 opinions

PROCEEDING in Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus.

The prisoner was confined in the county jail of the city and county of San Francisco under a commitment from the police court showing his conviction therein of vagrancy, and a judgment based thereon of thirty days’ imprisonment. The writ of habeas corpus was issued by us upon a petition alleging that no complaint was ever filed against petitioner in said court, that no trial was had and no evidence introduced in said court in support of any charge against him, and that he was denied all opportunity to obtain witnesses to disprove any claim that…

2Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Larkin v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. In Re Application of O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. In Re GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API