Legal Opinion

State v. Redmond

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 1992No. 90-0811; CA A69318PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for unlawful possession of a firearm, ORS 166.250, and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a frisk and subsequent search of his person during a traffic stop for several minor equipment violations. We affirm the conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm and reverse and remand on the conviction for possession of a controlled substance.

On March 25, 1990, at 1:23 a.m., Deputy Green observed three motorcycles and a Cadillac traveling south…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. SchellhornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. State v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. MiglavsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API