State v. Redmond
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for unlawful possession of a firearm, ORS 166.250, and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a frisk and subsequent search of his person during a traffic stop for several minor equipment violations. We affirm the conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm and reverse and remand on the conviction for possession of a controlled substance.
On March 25, 1990, at 1:23 a.m., Deputy Green observed three motorcycles and a Cadillac traveling south…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. SchellhornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. MiglavsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.