Legal Opinion

Midtaune v. Burns

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 10, 1989No. C2-88-1555PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appeal arises from a judgment denying appellant’s motion for: 1) specific performance of a contract for deed; 2) an order to set aside the court’s prior order dated October 8, 1987, granting summary judgment; 3) summary judgment against respondent Bank in favor of appellant; or 4) in the alternative, partial summary judgment or an order requiring respondent Bank to continue to participate as a party in litigation and, dismissing with prejudice appellant’s cause of action. We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion.

FACTS

On May 1, 1980, Wayne and Audrey…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Cook v. ConnollySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Pelser v. GingoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Meyer v. DroegemuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank Midwest, Minnesota, Iowa, N.A. v. LipetzkyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Goodhue State Bank v. LuhmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Prahmcoll Properties v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API