Midtaune v. Burns
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appeal arises from a judgment denying appellant’s motion for: 1) specific performance of a contract for deed; 2) an order to set aside the court’s prior order dated October 8, 1987, granting summary judgment; 3) summary judgment against respondent Bank in favor of appellant; or 4) in the alternative, partial summary judgment or an order requiring respondent Bank to continue to participate as a party in litigation and, dismissing with prejudice appellant’s cause of action. We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion.
FACTS
On May 1, 1980, Wayne and Audrey…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Cook v. ConnollySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Pelser v. GingoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Meyer v. DroegemuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bank Midwest, Minnesota, Iowa, N.A. v. LipetzkyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Goodhue State Bank v. LuhmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Prahmcoll Properties v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991