Legal Opinion

Prahmcoll Properties v. Sanford

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 27, 1991No. CX-91-342Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Sanford appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent vendor for the outstanding balance due on a contract for deed. The trial court held that appellant, as as-signee, assumed the obligations of Whitfield Corporation, the assignor and original vendee. Sanford contends the trial court drew erroneous conclusions of law from the facts. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

On September 12, 1986, respondent Prahmcoll Properties (Prahmcoll) sold a 15 acre parcel in Scott County to Whitfield Corporation (Whitfield) by a contract for deed (CD). The property was located on the northern…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Pioneer Loan & Land Co. v. CowdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. General Electric Co. v. LevineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Midtaune v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Borer v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API