Legal Opinion

Goodhue State Bank v. Luhman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 6, 1992No. C6-92-493Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of evidence for a verdict finding there was a valid assignment of hers and her husband’s vendors’ interest in a contract for deed on 160 acres of farmland. Appellant also claims the assignment agreement is void for failure to comply with the statute of frauds. We affirm on both issues.

FACTS

Appellant Mildred Luhman and her husband H. Raymond Luhman (now deceased) sold 160 acres of farmland to their son, Allan Luhman (Luhman), and his wife on a contract for deed for $120,000. Luhman had a line of credit in his own name at respondent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Hauenstein v. Loctite Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API