Legal Opinion
Hotchkin v. Hotchkin
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 5, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
105 N.J. Super. 475 (1969)
253 A.2d 184
VIRGINIA HOTCHKIN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT FRANCIS HOTCHKIN, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided May 5, 1969.
Mr. Louis B. Le Duc for plaintiff.
Mr. Martin L. Haines for defendant (Messrs. Dimon, Haines and Bunting, attorneys).
WICK, J.S.C.
Plaintiff Virginia Hotchkin, the former wife of Robert Francis Hotchkin, institutes this suit for the partition of various securities which are presently held in the joint names of plaintiff and her ex-husband. Based on the testimony and exhibits presented at trial, I find the pertinent facts to be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Baird v. MooreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- MacFadden v. MacFaddenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Michalski v. MichalskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Raymond v. RaymondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Libeau v. FoxCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2005
- Goodpasture v. GoodpastureNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Willcher v. WillcherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Brewer v. SchalanskySupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.