Capone v. Ranzulli
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
This is a bill for a mandatory injunction, restraining defendant from continuing certain encroachments upon the lands of the respective complainants. It is admitted that the defendant has erected buildings which encroach upon complainants' property.
Defendant alleges that when the cellar was excavated for one building it was found that the proposed building would encroach on land of complainant Petrucellis, and that thereupon Petrucellis gave oral permission to defendant to proceed. This Petrucellis denies. Defendant also alleges that when the other building was about five feet above the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hirschberg v. FlusserNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
- Lawrence v. SpringerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
- Barbour v. BarbourSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Krich v. ZemelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Hartman v. PowellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCullough v. HartpenceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Union Trust Co. v. Goerke Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Wujciak v. WujciakNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Scuorzo v. InfantinoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929