Legal Opinion
In re Brigham Street
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Damage parcels 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12 and 13. These parcels lie within the southerly fork of Avenue XI. Originally, they were part of a farm which extended easterly to Ocean avenue. In 1874 the town survey commission laid out Avenue XT as an eighty-foot street similar to the present layout. In 1896, in a proceeding to acquire an easement over Avenue XT, the then owner received an award of almost $4,000. Thereafter the owner conveyed the property “ excepting therefrom all the above described premises taken for the opening of Avenue XJ and all that part of said *809premises included in that portion of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bissell v. . the New York Central R.R. CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- City of Cohoes v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Russell v. City of LincolnIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Bridges v. . WyckoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Concerned Loved Ones & Lot Owners Ass'n v. PenceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- In re The City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- CONCERNED LOVED ONES v. PenceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- City & County of Honolulu v. SeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1953
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.