Legal Opinion · Dissent

City & County of Honolulu v. See

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1953No. 2930Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

LE BARON, J.

I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion from my study of the case rests upon a failure to properly evaluate the facts and gives the appearance of misapplying the settled law of this Territory as well as that of all the other jurisdictions of the United States. Such an underlying fallacy, as I see it, permeates the opinion from beginning to end and makes it incumbent upon me to dissent to that opinion in its entirety. My reasons for dissent, therefore, can best be expressed by setting forth the facts and the law in the form of an opinion, which, to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. King v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Casella v. SneiersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Prescott v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Lankin v. TerwilligerOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Burkhard v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API