Legal Opinion

Bridges v. . Wyckoff

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1876PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department reversing a judgment for the plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial without a jury, and granting a new trial. This was an action of trespass. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. The land in question never was a highway. (Powers v. Suff. Mfg.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department reversing a judgment for the plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial without a jury, and granting a new trial. This was an action of trespass. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. The land in question never was a highway. (Powers v. Suff. Mfg. Co., 4 Cush., 332; Hobbs v. Lowell, 19 Pick., 405; City of Oswego v. Oswego Canal Co., 6 N. Y., 267; Childs v. Chappel, 9 id., 258; Holdane v. Trustees, etc., 21 id., 478; Clements v. Vil. of West Troy, 16 Barb., 251; Trustees, etc.,…

1Opinion of the CourtEarl, J.

It appears that prior to 1836 the owner of land which included the premises in question, laid his land out into lots with streets, one of which is called Locust street. These lots and the streets were designated on a map filed in the county clerk’s office. Subsequently lots were sold bounding them upon this street to various persons. Several of the lots were conveyed to Joseph F. Bridges in 1836, some of them lying on Locust street. The deed to him, after describing the lots and bounding then upon the side of the street, contained the following clause: “ together with all the right, title and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Requa v. . the City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. The City of Oswego v. . the Oswego Canal CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Baker v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Driggs v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Schmitt v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Marble v. PriceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. In re Commissioners of Public ParksNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. In re Brigham StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API