Legal Opinion
In re the City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1933Published
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The claimant, 430 West Ninety-fifth Street Corporation, objects to the awards made in the tentative decree for damage parcels 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12 and 13, lying in the south fork of Avenue U. Nominal damages were awarded for the taking of the fee of those parcels. The claimant now urges that the conclusion reached in the decision of Matter of Brigham Street (136 Misc. 808) is in conflict with Matter of City of New York (East 177th St.) (239 N. Y. 119), and that the court erred in holding that there was a dedication.
On the hearing of the objections, claimant for the first time introduced four…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trustees of Watertown v. Cowen & BaggNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- In Re Vil. of Olean v. . SteynerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Matter of City of New York (E. 177th St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- In Re City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands Required for the Opening of Avenue " D "New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Glover v. ShieldsNew York Supreme Court · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.