Legal Opinion
Beattie v. D.M. Collections, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 3, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-177 MMSPublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
This case was brought by plaintiffs Frank and Louise Beattie against defendants D.M. Collections, Inc. and K.M. De-Lacy for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”). Defendants have moved for summary judgment, and plaintiffs have cross-moved for partial summary judgment on the merits, reserving the issue of damages for trial. 1 The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C.A. 1692k and 28 U.S. C.A. § 1331.
STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) provides that summary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Huertas v. Galaxy Asset ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Stanley L. Crawford v. LVNV Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Troy L. Freyermuth v. Credit Bureau Services, Inc, D/B/A Checkmate of FremontCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Wilhelm v. Credico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Newman v. Checkrite California, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.