Legal Opinion
Huertas v. Galaxy Asset Management
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 11, 2011No. 10-2532PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Hector Huertas appeals pro se from the District Court’s dismissal of his claims against Asset Management Professionals (“AMP”) and Applied Card Bank f/k/a Cross Country Bank (“ACB”). 1 For the following reasons, we will affirm.
I
In addition to AMP and ACB, Huertas brought this lawsuit against four other defendants — Galaxy Asset Management fik/a Galaxy Asset purchasing (“Galaxy”); Capital Management Services, L.P.; Experian Information Solutions; and TransUnion, LLC. Huertas incurred credit card debt owed to ACB, which sold the debt obligation to Galaxy, which ultimately…
3Cases cited30 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stephen B. Batoff, ph.d. v. State Farm Insurance Company, Leonard M. Paul, ed.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Rosenau v. Unifund Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by158 opinions
- Michelle Tatis v. Allied Interstate LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Midland Funding, LLC v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Stanley L. Crawford v. LVNV Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Harold Hoffman v. Nordic Naturals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Scott McMahon v. LVNV Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.