Klamath Irrigation District v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1DissentGajarsa, Circuit Judge
Although the majority of the panel has requested a certification of three issues to the Oregon Supreme Court, I must respectfully dissent from such a request. We need not certify the questions because *1379of the unique procedural posture of this ease, and because the answers sought, in my judgment, are not required to decide the issues before this court. In particular, I disagree with the proposition that the effect of the 1905 Statute is a critical question with respect to the matter of certification vel non. In my judgment, the effect of the 1905 Statute is determinative as to the relative…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The Toro Company v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc. And Wci Outdoor Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Hannigan v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004