Legal Opinion
Scherzinger v. Portland Custodians Civil Service Board
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 8, 2004No. 0208-08154, 0210-09876, A120712 (Control), A120713PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Tamara McWilliams, Henry Shambry, and 90 other civil service custodians, to whom we collectively refer as “the custodians,” lost their jobs after the Portland Public School District (PPS) decided to contract out all its custodial work to a private contractor. This procedurally complex case involves two issues: (1) whether a decision by the Employment Relations Board (ERB) that PPS’s proposal to contract out its custodial work was not a prohibited subject of bargaining precluded the Custodians Civil Service Board (the board) from deciding that PPS’s dismissal 1 of the custodians violated the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ralph E. Thornton Cheryl A. Thornton v. City of St. Helens Warren Baker Brian LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Portland Public School District No. 1J v. Portland Custodian Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Scherzinger v. Portland Custodians Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- McWilliams v. Portland Public School District, No. 1JCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Portland Public Sch. v. Portland CustodianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.