Legal Opinion

United States v. 13.40 Acres of Land in City of Richmond

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 15, 1944No. 22764-GPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

The United States filed a complaint to condemn the fee title of approximately 13.40 acres of land in the City of Richmond, County of Contra Costa, State of California, commonly known and designated as “Easter Hill,” and containing rock material suitable for building and construction uses, naming the defendants C. Dudley DeVelbiss, J. Philip Murphy and Y. C. Soda, as owners of the property.

The owner defendants, by answer, alleged the fair market value of the land to be the sum of $600,000, and, in addition, prayed for the sum of $43,436 special damages.. Defendants City…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  4. United States v. Land in Dry Bed of Rosamond Lake, Cal.District Court, S.D. California · 1956
  5. United States v. 620.00 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Marion CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API