Legal Opinion

United States v. Land in Dry Bed of Rosamond Lake, Cal.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 23, 1956No. 16661-C, 16877-C, 17371-C, 17598-CPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.

This action concerns pai'cels of land lying in the dry bed of Rosamond Lake, California, taken by the government through eminent domain. The ultimate issue is the fair market value of the land as of the date of taking.

In pretrial proceedings, the court required the government and the defendant landownex’s to state what they would contend at the trial, would be the highest and best use or uses to which the land was reasonably suited or adapted; and required there be submitted en camera to the court for inspection, the value which the respective experts would…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Simpson v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. WhitehurstCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  2. Hoy v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Iske v. Metropolitan Utilities District of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Werner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. State Highway Commission v. NunesOregon Supreme Court · 1963

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API