Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Cox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 2002No. SCBD 4623PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

[ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? 1 and (2) Is a license suspension for sixty (60) days an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent's breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.

I

INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD

12 On 23 May 2001 the Oklahoma Bar Association (the Bar) commenced this disciplinary proceeding against Mark A. Cox (respondent), a licensed…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GroshonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GentrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GroshonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API