Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Gentry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 4, 2003No. SCBD 4773PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, V.C. J.

¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record1 submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? and (2) Is a public censure, the required attendance of Oklahoma-approved mandatory continuing legal education (MCLE) programs, the filing of an annual MCLE report and the payment of costs associated with this proceeding an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respon*137dent’s breach of professional discipline? We answer both questions in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Reinstatement of DeBackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OLIVERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. In Re the Reinstatement of DeBackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OLIVERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OLIVERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API