State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Gentry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, V.C. J.
¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record1 submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? and (2) Is a public censure, the required attendance of Oklahoma-approved mandatory continuing legal education (MCLE) programs, the filing of an annual MCLE report and the payment of costs associated with this proceeding an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respon*137dent’s breach of professional discipline? We answer both questions in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re the Reinstatement of DeBackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OLIVERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- In Re the Reinstatement of DeBackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OLIVERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OLIVERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016