Legal Opinion

O'CONNELL v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1974No. 20960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

In this workmen’s compensation case, claimant contends that he was in the scope and course of his employment when he suffered injuries as a result of accidentally driving his automobile into the rear of a truck at about 3 a.m. on the morning of June 29, 1972.

We agree with the conclusions of the hearing officer, Workmen’s Compensation Board and circuit court.

Claimant was an employe of a nursing home in St. Helens. He had a business purpose in going to Seaside, some 80 miles away. The date was flexible and he elected to make the trip on June 28, 1972, in order to combine business with pleasure.

A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Francis Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Fowers v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Seidl v. Dick Niles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bush v. ParmenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Simons v. SWF Plywood CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Hackney v. Tillamook Growers Co-Op.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Underwood v. Pendleton Grain GrowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API