Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Pendleton Grain Growers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 25, 1992No. 90-05925; CA A68728PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board determining that his injury did not occur in the course of his employment and is not compensable. We affirm.

Claimant sold tires in eastern Oregon. He worked in employer’s Pendleton store and lived in Milton-Freewater, approximately 30 miles away. His job duties included selling, repairing and periodically transporting tires between employer’s stores in Pendleton and Milton-Freewater, and his sales route included the area between the two towns. He had wide discretion regarding when and where to contact customers, and he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'CONNELL v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. Fowers v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Burge v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Faessler v. TurneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API