Legal Opinion

Fowers v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 15, 1974No. 13,038-LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

The sole question raised on this workmen’s compensation appeal is whether death resulting from an accident arose “* * * out of and in the course of employment* * *.” ORS 656.002 (6); 656.202 (1). The State Accident Insurance Fund denied the claim. The hearing officer, Workmen’s Compensation Board and circuit court all in turn allowed the claim. In setting forth the facts we borrow in large part from the briefs of the parties, both of which are examples of careful craftsmanship.

The deceased was the general manager of the Vale Consumers Co-op., headquartered in Vale. His duties involved working…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. Francis Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simons v. SWF Plywood CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. McBroom v. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. O'CONNELL v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Seidl v. Dick Niles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Underwood v. Pendleton Grain GrowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API