Legal Opinion

State v. Diamond Lakes Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 14, 2002No. 01-760PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T OM Glaze, Justice.

This case involves the cleanup of an environmentally contaminated gas-station site, and it requires us to interpret our statutes regarding when a period of limitations commences. Jurisdiction is in this court pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(b)(6).

The gas station at issue here is a Citgo facility, located at 498 East Page Street, in Malvern. As early as 1991, neighbors had complained of gasoline odors coming from the vicinity of the East Page Citgo. The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”) conducted soil and water tests that showed some contamination; for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Chalmers v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Dunlap v. McCartySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Orsini v. Larry Moyer Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  2. Brewer v. PooleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Quality Optical of Jonesboro, Inc. v. Trusty Optical, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Hackelton v. MalloySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. IC Corp. v. Hoover Treated Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API