Legal Opinion
United States v. Puchalski
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 30, 2012No. C.A. No. 3:11-cv-3360-CMCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS
CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, District Judge.
Through this qui tam action, Plaintiffs Andrew Battiata, M.D. (“Battiata”) and Jenny Raybon (“Raybon”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) seek recovery on behalf of the United States for alleged violations of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. (“FCA”). The matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the seven counterclaims asserted by Defendants Robert Puchalski, M.D. (“Puchalski”) and South Carolina ENT, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, P.A. (“SC ENT”) (collectively “Defendants”). For…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- George Zahodnick v. International Business MacHines Corporation Lockheed Martin Federal Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Belinda Faye Lyle v. Food Lion, Incorporated v. Wayne Tew, Third Party Wayne Tew v. Food Lion, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Cell Therapeutics, Inc. v. Lash Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- in Re Xerox Corporation and Xerox State Healthcare, LLC F/K/A Acs State Healthcare, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Marietta Area Healthcare, Inc. v. KingDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2021
- Marietta Area Healthcare, Inc. v. KingDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2023