Legal Opinion
Cell Therapeutics, Inc. v. Lash Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 2009No. 08-35619PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed on November 18, 2009, is amended as follows: On slip Opinion page 15321, line 9, at the end of the paragraph, insert the following text: We make no judgment regarding the timeliness or the ultimate viability of what Lash characterizes as CTI’s untimely supplemental disclosure regarding its $12.3 million in alleged business losses.
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Margaret Stewart Jamey L. Paulson William Keith Laura Spencer Lee Callison Stephanie Glowa Terri Gorecki Dan Berryman v. U.S. BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Robertson v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- MacDonald v. Grace Church SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Rosemary Garity v. Apwu National Labor Org.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Tobar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Heard v. TildenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Phillips & CohenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.